Contamulte

Details

km/h

The speed written on the notice, before any reduction.

20 km/h260 km/h
km/h

The limit in force where the measurement was taken.

10 km/h150 km/h
Road type
Vehicle
Second time in a built-up area
Hour of the offence

On this site: day month year

On this site: day month year

Non-cash settlement

How the band is reached

  1. Recorded value95 km/h
  2. Art. 345 reductionFlat floor 5 km/h−5 km/h
  3. Post-tolerance speed90 km/h
  4. Band10 km/h – 40 km/hPenalty and points+40 km/h over the limit

Reduction applied to the recorded speed: −5 km/h. Speed used for banding: 90 km/h. The device's own instrumental tolerance is already inside this reduction.

  • from € 173 to € 694Corridor
  • € 173Payable
  • 3points

How it is paid

Corridor

from € 173 to € 694

Payable

€ 173

Within 5 days

€ 121.10

  1. 5 days
  2. 60 days
  3. After the window

This is not a discount: art. 202 calls this sum «una somma pari al minimo fissato dalle singole norme» — a sum equal to the minimum the individual provision sets, i.e. the floor of the charged article's own corridor.

It is the exception, not the rule: a large share of the catalogue carries confiscation of the vehicle or suspension of the licence, and in those cases this reduction does not exist.

The two figures above are conditional: they hold if payment is made within the deadline stated on each. Give the service date and the payment date to see which one applies to you.

In force as of
1 January 2021
Statutory chain
CdS art. 142 co. 6 → D.P.R. 495/1992 art. 345 co. 2

Art. 345 reduction

Speed-camera tolerance: how the charged speed is arrived at

Art. 345 reduction

«al valore rilevato sia applicata una riduzione pari al 5%, con un minimo di 5 km/h. Nella riduzione è compresa anche la tolleranza strumentale.»

D.P.R. 16 December 1992, no. 495, art. 345 co. 2

Art. 142 co. 6 CdS does not set the tolerance: it defers to «il regolamento di esecuzione». That regulation is D.P.R. 495/1992, and the rule is in its art. 345 co. 2. The reduction applies to the recorded value BEFORE the band is chosen.

The reduction is the greater of 5% of the recorded value and 5 km/h. The two branches agree exactly at 100 km/h: below it the flat floor binds, at or above it the percentage does. You can check this arithmetic yourself.

The device's own margin of error is already inside this reduction. A second one is never added.

Art. 345 reduction

What this calculation does not cover

Art. 345 co. 3 sets a different regime for average speed computed between two motorway toll gates, with separate percentages by deduced speed band. That rule exists, and our model does not represent it: it concerns an enforcement method distinct from fixed and hand-held cameras. We are stating the scope of our model, not a silence in the law.

What this page does not claim

We do not say that a given notice applied the reduction, that a given device is type-approved, or that a tolerance argument wins an appeal. The reduction is prescribed «in sede di approvazione» of the apparatus and applies to the recorded value: that is what the provision says.

What we found

The amounts are bounded by a decree that is due

Change pending

The decree is due by 1 December 2026 and takes effect on 1 January 2027, indexed to the ISTAT variation for the 2025-2026 two-year period. We predict no figure: the index cannot be ascertained until the period closes, the decree does not exist, and the mechanism's suspension has already been extended several times. A predicted figure here would be an invention.

Art. 195 co. 3 CdS; L. 197/2022 art. 1 co. 497, as amended by D.L. 31 December 2025 no. 200 art. 9 co. 1

Finding your row

Type in the two numbers printed on your notice

The tool wants the recorded speed — on an Italian notice it is the line reading «velocità rilevata», sometimes «velocità accertata» — and the limit that applied at that point, «limite di velocità». Both are printed. Do not work out the excess yourself and enter that instead: the deduction the regulation prescribes applies to the recorded value first, and subtracting in the wrong order can put you in the wrong band.

What comes back is the arithmetic in the order the law performs it: the recorded value, the deduction, the speed that remains after it, and only then the band. That sequence is the deliverable. A tool that shows you an amount without showing how the band was reached is asking you to trust it, and on a page about money and a driving licence that is the wrong thing to ask.

Everything the tool prints is read from the statute text as consulted, band by band. Nothing is estimated, nothing is averaged across regions, and no figure is adjusted for what a comune "usually" charges.

In detail

What the deduction is, and what it is not

The deduction is 5% of the recorded value with a minimum of 5 km/h, and the regulation states in the same breath that the device's instrumental tolerance is already inside it: «nella riduzione è compresa anche la tolleranza strumentale». So there is exactly one deduction. Anyone telling you to take off a further margin for the equipment is describing a second subtraction the text does not provide for.

Below 100 km/h the flat floor is the larger of the two branches and therefore the one that binds; at or above it the percentage is larger and binds instead. The regulation writes this as a single formula rather than as two rules, and the crossover is simply where the formula's two arms meet.

The deduction is also not a favour. It is prescribed «in sede di approvazione» of the apparatus — as part of how the device is approved for use — and it is applied to the value the device recorded. That is what the provision says, and it is all this page claims about it.

What this calculator cannot know about your case

It cannot know which limit was actually posted and enforceable where you were stopped, whether the notice applied the reduction correctly, whether the device was approved, or whether any accessory sanction was recorded against you. It computes the statutory ladder from two numbers you supply. Everything else on the paper — the article charged, the enforcement body, the dates — governs the real outcome.

CdS artt. 142 and 202 · D.P.R. 495/1992 art. 345

Paying it

Why the result shows a corridor and a payable figure, not one number

Italian traffic penalties are ranges. The article fixes a minimum and a maximum, and art. 202 makes the minimum the sum you may pay to close the matter within 60 days. The result panel therefore shows both: the corridor as the statute writes it, and the payable figure that follows from it.

The third block is the 30% that comes off inside 5 days. It is shown greyed with its reason where it is not available, because the reason is the useful part — confiscation of the vehicle under art. 210 co. 3, or suspension of the licence, are the two exclusions art. 202 co. 1 names, and on the upper speeding bands the second one applies. A fourth state exists as well, and it is reached two different ways: for the offences art. 202 co. 3 and co. 3-bis name, reduced payment is barred entirely rather than merely reduced, and co. 3-bis does that by naming 14 articles in a closed list; separately, confiscation of the vehicle under art. 210 co. 3 also bars reduced payment entirely, not merely the 30% reduction above — the two accessory sanctions are not symmetric, and only suspension of the licence stops at the smaller exclusion.

If you miss the window, the position changes in kind rather than in degree. Where neither payment nor an appeal has been made in time, art. 203 co. 3 turns the notice itself into an enforceable title for 50% of the offence’s statutory MAXIMUM plus procedural costs — a fraction of the ceiling, not a multiple of the reduced figure you were quoted. From there art. 206 routes collection through the ordinary machinery for unpaid public debts, and the surcharge that machinery applies is 10% for every six-month period from the one in which the sanction became exigible. That surcharge ABSORBS interest rather than running alongside it, so it is the whole of the growth rather than one layer of it.

In brief

The controls that change the answer

Night. Between 22:00 and 7:00 art. 195 co. 2-bis increases the pecuniary sanction by a third for the articles it lists, speeding among them. It is an increase to the money, not to the points, and it applies to that closed list only — never by analogy to an article that is not on it.

Vehicle class. The doubling in art. 142 co. 11 applies to the 7 classes art. 142 co. 3 enumerates, and it doubles the accessory sanction alongside the money. If you were driving a van under the weight thresholds, none of that applies to you.

Repeat inside a built-up area. Where the middle band is breached twice within 12 months in a built-up area, a different corridor governs — from € 220 to € 880 — with a suspension of 15 to 30 days. The tool cannot know your history: that control is an assertion you make, and the result follows the assertion.

Every amount here is bounded by a decree that does not exist yet

The biennial index-linked update of Italian traffic-fine amounts has been suspended since 2023, and the suspension chain now runs to the end of 2026. A decree is due before the end of that year, taking effect on 1 January 2027, indexed to the consumer-price variation for the 2025-2026 two-year period. We predict no figure: the index cannot exist until the period closes, the decree does not exist, the suspension has already been extended repeatedly, and the last comparable variation was negative. Any site quoting you 2027 amounts today is quoting an invention.

CdS art. 195 co. 3 · L. 197/2022 art. 1 co. 497, as amended

Draft in progress: the long-form text of this page is still being written.

Next step

Start from the number on your notice

The calculator shows the art. 345 reduction step by step, then the band, then the payable figure and the deadlines.

PREVIEW — a preview of the site, not an official document